fbpx

Call Us Now: 716.208.3525

EEOICPA & RECA Attorneys

Stephens & Stephens has obtained over $60 million through the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act and the Energy Employees Occupation Illness Compensation Act for our clients

Gloria ReynoldsGloria Reynolds
04:16 30 Mar 24
Stephens & Stephens was very helpful in getting my claim processed and helping me in getting my settlement, staff was knowledgeable and professional and very kind if I call and needed to ask a question they would call me back within a timely manner. Thank you so much for your help .Continue to be blessed Gloria
Dee GodfreyDee Godfrey
18:49 12 Mar 24
I was astounded with the service I received from Mr. Hugh Stephens in regard to my husband's compensation claim. He was not only efficient, but also compassionate, and communicated clearly and frequently. Because of his outstanding efforts and expertise, I, who am now a grieving widow, am unexpectedly stabile and secure. I had little to do. He did all the heavy lifting. I'm so very grateful for his help. I'll always remember not only his professionalism, but also his kindness.
Audrey OgletreeAudrey Ogletree
22:19 09 Mar 24
From: Laurence OgletreeI received good assistance from Stephens & Stephens in submitting the recent claim for increased impairment benefits from the Energy Workers program.
Randy MooreRandy Moore
14:48 07 Mar 24
I was a machinist at Honeywell F.M.&T.and developed bilateral tinnitus and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. They helped me file a claim with EEOICPA in 2017. Stephen’s & Stephen’s was very good to work with, they take care of all the paperwork and help with any paperwork I receive from the Department of Labor. They stay on top of things helping with scheduling impairment reviews etc.I feel that without their help this would have been a very overwhelming process.I plan on still using them if any other illnesses occur due to my employment with Honeywell.
Mike DauzatMike Dauzat
15:54 02 Mar 24
I highly recommend Stevens and Stevens. Hugh Stevens and his staff are very professional and very friendly. They're extremely good at making sure you get the full amount of money you deserve. If you need a DOL lawyer, I highly recommend this team. I can't be more happy that I picked Stevens and Stevens.
Mary YbarraMary Ybarra
01:33 27 Feb 24
Stephen’s and Stephen’s has kept fight for my dad. Now they are fight for my mom. They are on top of things and I would recommend them to anyone who needs help and guidance with the Uranium mines.
Dianne HarperDianne Harper
01:02 17 Feb 24
Robert and I are very pleased with Mr. Hugh Stephens and all that he has done for us. From the first moment we spoke, we sensed that though Mr. Stephens exhibits sharp business acumen, he cares deeply about his clients and he has a huge heart.
Diane pontonDiane ponton
17:38 07 Feb 24
I tried to get others to help me with this claim, and it wasn"t until I hired Mr. Stephens that things started happening. I would recommend any one to get in touch with him . I would go to him again, if i ever needed to.
Judy LeonardJudy Leonard
22:26 06 Feb 24
I very much appreciate the successful litigation concerning my husband's Hanford work related illness. Stephens & Stephens LLP were thorough, caring, considerate, and fair during this difficult time.
Kenneth GKenneth G
18:23 03 Feb 24
Mr. Stephens was able to simplify an otherwise complicated lengthy process (DEEOIC) to file an initial claim as well as a claim for impairment benefits.
dave DONAIDdave DONAID
18:08 03 Feb 24
Frankie KnucFrankie Knuc
19:24 08 Jan 24
I had other attorneys hired in Cortez, Colorado and Grand Jct., Colorado to assist me with receiving my uranium claim, but they were not successful. I was advised by an employee of CNS of Stephens & Stephens, LLP good work. I contacted them & they took my case It was settled very quickly. I have been very pleased with this group & would advise others of their prompt service. I would recommend them to others. Respectfully, Frankie Knuckles
Rebecca ConsolRebecca Consol
19:57 22 Dec 23
My family used Stephen’s and Stephen’s for a settlement case. We were extremely pleased with all they did. They were very professional, easy to get a hold of, and invaluable when it came to answering questions and handling complicated Department of Labor issues and forms. They also did everything in a very timely manner. I have already recommended them to other people.
Thomas CliffordThomas Clifford
15:29 21 Dec 23
I have been represented by Hugh Stevens for several years now, He and his staff has made everything so easy for me. I had lung cancer from working in the uranium processing industry, they have opened so many doors for me and made dealing with DOL so much easier. They always answer my questions in a very timely manner. I have referred several other people to him and he has been able to get them through this process also. There are benefits that I was not aware of that he has brought to my attention and been able to lead me through the process of obtaining them. I would most highly recommend him to lead anyone through this process.
Lonnie killingHawkLonnie killingHawk
02:35 14 Dec 23
When I first contacted Stephens & Stephens I was at the end of my rope with DOL. Hough and his staff got me on track and handled everything with DOL and just made this process so easy. Do not know where I'd be with out them. They are able to communicate at a layman's level and understand the client. Would strongly recommend this firm.
Ruthy LyonRuthy Lyon
21:00 28 Sep 23
Our initial conversation with Mr. Stephens was productive & reassuring. His previous experience with similar cases was obvious and very helpful, in both asking us specific questions for clarification & also addressing our own questions. Breanna is also a great asset to their team.
James O'DayJames O'Day
15:07 13 Sep 23
I have referred several friends to Hugh Stephens and they were more satisfied than they ever expected. I would refer him with confidence to anyone in need. I trust when he speaks for me, for example, in court. He is a good communicator and a deep thinker. He is well respected in his profession. He handles environmental law, injury law, and medical malpractice. He is tactful and direct and knows what he is doing. He knows the legal briar patches well.
js_loader

EEOICPA Covered Illnesses: Ovarian Cancer

The EEOICPA was passed in 2000. It provides compensation to workers who became ill as a result of their employment manufacturing nuclear weapons in the USA, as well as their spouses, children, and grandchildren.

Are you eligible for compensation? If you or a family member worked at any of the Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) and Department of Energy (DOE) Covered Facilities listed on this website and became ill, you may be entitled to compensation of up to $400K plus medical benefits. Call EEOICPA Counsel Hugh Stephens at 1-855-548-4494 or fill out our free claim evaluation, We can help even if you’ve already filed, even if your claim was denied!

In these pages, we present general definitions of Illnesses covered by the Act, followed by specific references to the disease from the EEOICPA Procedure Manual, Bulletins, and Final Decisions of the Final Adjudication Board to clarify how these maldies might relate to the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act.

Ovarian Cancer

 
Below we have collected specific references to ovarian cancer from the DEEOIC Procedure Manual, Circulars, and Final Decisions, to illustrate how this illness is viewed under the EEOICPA.

 

A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia.

Ovarian cancer

Cancer – ovaries

Last reviewed: November 17, 2012.

Ovarian cancer is cancer that starts in the ovaries. The ovaries are the female reproductive organs that produce eggs.

Causes, incidence, and risk factors

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer among women. It causes more deaths than any other type of female reproductive cancer.

The cause is unknown.

Risk of developing ovarian cancer may be due to:

  • The fewer children a woman has and the later in life she gives birth, the higher her risk of ovarian cancer.
  • Certain gene problems (defects in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes) are responsible for a small number of ovarian cancer cases.
  • Women who have had breast cancer or have a family history of breast or ovarian cancer have an increased risk of ovarian cancer.
  • Women who take estrogen replacement only (not with progesterone) for 5 years or more may have a high risk of ovarian cancer. Birth control pills, however, decrease the risk of ovarian cancer.
  • Fertility drugs probably do not increase the risk of ovarian cancer.
  • Older women are at highest risk of developing ovarian cancer. Most deaths from ovarian cancer occur in women age 55 and older.

Procedure Manual

Page 47

uu.  Specified Cancers are listed in Section 30.5(ff) of the regulations.  An employee must be diagnosed with one of these specific types of cancer to be considered eligible for benefits as a member of the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC).  The list of specified cancers, which is derived from section 4(b)(2) of the RECA Amendments of 2000, is as follows:

(5) The following diseases, provided onset was at least five years after first occupational exposure:

(c)  Primary cancer of the:

(xiv) Ovary;

Page 176

e. Other Diseases. For the following diseases, onset must have been at least five years after initial exposure during qualifying SEC employment:

(3) Primary cancer of the:

(n) Ovary;

Page 292

2. RECA Background.

c. Section 4 of RECA.

(1) Downwinders.

(b) Covered Illnesses: Leukemia (other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia), multiple myeloma, lymphomas (other than Hodgkin’s disease), and primary cancer of the thyroid, male or female breast, esophagus, stomach, pharynx, small intestine, pancreas, bile ducts, gall bladder, salivary gland, urinary bladder, brain, colon, ovary, liver (except if cirrhosis or hepatitis B is indicated), or lung.

Circulars

Page 34

12-13 (1) Sarcoma of the lung is a specified cancer. (2) When cancer of the fallopian tubes is considered to be ovarian cancer, which is a specified cancer.

EEOICPA CIRCULAR NO. 12-13  May 11, 2012

SUBJECT:  (1)  Sarcoma of the lung is a specified cancer.

(2)
  When cancer of the fallopian tubes is considered to be ovarian cancer, which is a specified cancer.

The purpose of this Circular is to provide clarification on two cancers that can be considered as specified cancers under the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC).  The Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation asked the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to provide guidance on whether the above-referenced cancers can be included as specified cancers.  The guidance provided by NCI is as follows:

(1)
 
Sarcoma of the lung:  Sarcoma refers to a diverse group of cancerous tumors found in various locations in the body such as the bones and soft tissue (also called connective tissue).  Primary lung sarcomas are classified according to their histological features.  Sarcoma of the lung is considered a lung cancer. 

(2)  Cancer of the fallopian tube:  An endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the fallopian tube is considered as an ovarian cancer under the following condition: An endometrioid carcinoma of the fallopian tube from which a transition zone is identified and where the endometrium is negative should be called a primary endometrioid carcinoma of the fallopian tube.  High-grade endometrioid carcinoma involving the fallopian tube may also involve the ovary.  If both organs are involved, the convention is to call it ovarian cancer.

Lung cancer and ovarian cancer are specified cancers under the SEC.  Therefore, the DEEOIC has determined that this information allows for the two cancers as described above to be treated as specified cancers under the SEC.

RACHEL P. LEITON

Director, Division of Energy Employees

Occupational Illness Compensation

Distribution List No. 1: Claims Examiners, Supervisory Claims Examiners, Technical Assistants, Customer Service Representatives, Fiscal Officers, FAB District Managers, Operation Chiefs, Hearing Representatives, District Office Mail & File Section

Final Decisions

Page920

EEOICPA Fin. Dec. No. 18528-2006 (Dep’t of Labor, February 8, 2008)

NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION 

This is the Notice of Final Decision of the Final Adjudication Branch (FAB) concerning your claim for survivor benefits under Part B of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000, as amended (EEOICPA), 42 U.S.C. § 7384 et seq.  For the reasons set forth below, your claim for survivor benefits is accepted.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On January 3, 2002, you filed a claim for survivor benefits under EEOICPA as a surviving parent of [Employee].  You claimed the employee was employed by Dow Chemical, Rockwell International and EG&G at the Rocky Flats Plant[1] from 1964 to 1966, and from June 1, 1981 to 1993.  The Department of Energy verified the employee was employed at the Rocky Flats Plant from September 17, 1964 to July 25, 1966, and from June 1, 1981 to June 29, 1995.

You claimed the employee was diagnosed with ovarian cancer.  The pathology report of the tissue obtained on December 28, 1995 described a diagnosis of moderately differentiated endometrioid-type adenocarcinoma of the left ovary.

The employee’s death certificate showed she was born on March 31, 1946; died on January 25, 2001 at the age of 54; and was widowed.  The death certificate also listed [Employee’s Spouse] as her spouse; [Employee’s Father] as her father; and [Claimant] as her mother.  The death certificate for [Employee’s Spouse] showed he died on February 15, 2000, and was married to [Employee] (maiden name given).  The employee’s birth and hospital certificates showed [Employee] was born on March 31, 1946; to [Employee’s Father]and [Claimant][Employee’s Father]‘s death certificate showed he died on November 27, 1993.

On December 2, 2002, the district office forwarded a complete copy of the case record to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) for reconstruction of the radiation dose the employee received in the course of her employment at the Rocky Flats Plant.  On February 17, 2006, a final decision was issued under Part B of EEOICPA denying your claim for survivor benefits based on a probability of causation of 26.93%, which showed that the employee’s cancer did not meet the 50% “at least likely as not” mandated level for compensability.

On August 6, 2007, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) designated the following classes of employees for addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC):  Employees of DOE, its predecessor agencies, or DOE contractors or subcontractors who were monitored or should have been monitored for neutron exposures while working at the Rocky Flats Plant in Golden, Colorado, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days from April 1, 1952 through December 31, 1958 and/or January 1, 1959 through December 31, 1966, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.  The SEC designations for these classes became effective on September 5, 2007.

A review of the evidence of record indicates that the employee had a period of employment aggregating 250 days during the SEC period (January 1, 1959 through December 31, 1966); was monitored for neutron exposures, as her name appears on the Neutron Dose Report (NDR)[2]; and was diagnosed with ovarian cancer, a specified cancer, more than five years after her first exposure to radiation at the Rocky Flats Plant.  Based on the SEC determinations for certain employees at the Rocky Flats Plant, a Director’s Order was issued on December 28, 2007 that vacated the prior decision issued under Part B.

On December 28, 2007, the district office issued a recommended decision to accept your claim for survivor benefits under Part B of EEOICPA and referred the case to the FAB for an independent assessment of the evidence and a final decision on your claim. 

On January 11, 2008, the FAB received your signed statement certifying that neither you nor the employee filed any lawsuits, tort suits, or state workers’ compensation claims; or received any awards or benefits related to ovarian cancer; that you have not pled guilty or been convicted of any charges connected with an application for or receipt of federal or state workers’ compensation; and the employee had no children.

After considering the recommended decision and all evidence in the case, the FAB hereby makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT

  1. On January 3, 2002, you filed a claim for survivor benefits as the surviving parent of [Employee]
  1. You are the surviving parent of [Employee], as supported by birth and death certificates.
  1. The employee was employed at the Rocky Flats Plant, a covered DOE facility, from September 17, 1964 to July 25, 1966, and from June 1, 1981 to June 29, 1995.
  1. Effective September 5, 2007, employees at the Rocky Flats Plant that worked from April 1, 1952 through December 31, 1958, and/or January 1, 1959, through December 31, 1966, and were monitored or should have been monitored for neutron exposure, were added to the SEC.
  1. The employee has a period of employment at the Rocky Flats Plant aggregating 250 days during the SEC period, September 17, 1964 through July 25, 1966.
  1. The employee was monitored for neutron dose exposure during the period September 17, 1964 to July 25, 1966, as confirmed by the NDR.
  1. The employee was diagnosed with ovarian cancer (a specified cancer) on December 28, 1995. This diagnosis occurred more than five years after her first exposure to radiation at the Rocky Flats Plant.
  1. The evidence of record contains your signed statement certifying that neither you nor the employee filed a lawsuit, tort suits, or state workers’ compensation claims; received any awards or benefits related to ovarian cancer; that you have not pled guilty or been convicted of any charges connected with an application for or receipt of federal or state workers’ compensation; and the employee had no children.

Based on the above-noted findings of fact in this claim, the FAB hereby also makes the following:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Pursuant to the regulations implementing the EEOICPA, a claimant has 60 days from the date of issuance of the recommended decision to raise objections to that decision to the FAB.  20 C.F.R § 30.310(a).  If an objection is not raised during the 60-day period, the FAB will consider any and all objections to the recommended decision waived and issue a final decision affirming the district office’s recommended decision.  20 C.F.R. § 30.316(a).  On January 11, 2008, the FAB received your written notification waiving any and all objections to the recommended decision.

Part B of EEOICPA provides benefits for an employee diagnosed with a specified cancer who is a member of the SEC if, and only if, that employee contracted the specified cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility.  Such employee is considered “a covered employee with cancer.” 

On August 6, 2007, the Secretary of HHS designated the following classes of employees for addition to the SEC:  Employees of DOE, its predecessor agencies, or DOE contractors or subcontractors who were monitored or should have been monitored for neutron exposures while working at the Rocky Flats Plant in Golden, Colorado, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days from April 1, 1952 through December 31, 1958 and/or January 1, 1959 through December 31, 1966, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the SEC.  The SEC designations for these classes became effective September 5, 2007. 

The employee is a member of the SEC as designated above and defined by 42 U.S.C. §§ 7384l(14)(C) and 7384q of the Act, and has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer, a specified cancer.  The FAB concludes that the employee is a “covered employee with cancer” pursuant to the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 7384l(9)(A).

You have established that you are the employee’s eligible survivor, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 7384s(e)(3)(C) of the Act.  Therefore, you are entitled to compensation in the amount of $150,000.00, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 7384s(a)(1) and (e)(1)(C).

Accordingly, your claim for survivor benefits for the employee’s ovarian cancer is approved for compensation under Part B of the Act.

Denver, Colorado

Anna Navarro

Hearing Representative

Final Adjudication Branch

[1] According to the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Worker Advocacy on the DOE website at http://www.hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/fwsp/advocacy/faclist/showfacility.cfm., the Rocky Flats Plant in Golden, Colorado is a covered DOE facility from 1951 to present.

[2] The Rocky Flats Neutron Dosimetry Reconstruction Project (NDRP) was a historical project undertaken to better reconstruct neutron dose for workers at the Rocky Flats Plant.  As part of that Project, a list of 5,308 names was compiled.  Every name on the list represents someone who was monitored for neutron dose.