Call Us Now: 716.208.3525

EEOICPA & RECA Attorneys

Stephens & Stephens has obtained over $60 million through the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act and the Energy Employees Occupation Illness Compensation Act for our clients

Gloria ReynoldsGloria Reynolds
04:16 30 Mar 24
Stephens & Stephens was very helpful in getting my claim processed and helping me in getting my settlement, staff was knowledgeable and professional and very kind if I call and needed to ask a question they would call me back within a timely manner. Thank you so much for your help .Continue to be blessed Gloria
Dee GodfreyDee Godfrey
18:49 12 Mar 24
I was astounded with the service I received from Mr. Hugh Stephens in regard to my husband's compensation claim. He was not only efficient, but also compassionate, and communicated clearly and frequently. Because of his outstanding efforts and expertise, I, who am now a grieving widow, am unexpectedly stabile and secure. I had little to do. He did all the heavy lifting. I'm so very grateful for his help. I'll always remember not only his professionalism, but also his kindness.
Audrey OgletreeAudrey Ogletree
22:19 09 Mar 24
From: Laurence OgletreeI received good assistance from Stephens & Stephens in submitting the recent claim for increased impairment benefits from the Energy Workers program.
Randy MooreRandy Moore
14:48 07 Mar 24
I was a machinist at Honeywell F.M.&T.and developed bilateral tinnitus and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. They helped me file a claim with EEOICPA in 2017. Stephen’s & Stephen’s was very good to work with, they take care of all the paperwork and help with any paperwork I receive from the Department of Labor. They stay on top of things helping with scheduling impairment reviews etc.I feel that without their help this would have been a very overwhelming process.I plan on still using them if any other illnesses occur due to my employment with Honeywell.
Mike DauzatMike Dauzat
15:54 02 Mar 24
I highly recommend Stevens and Stevens. Hugh Stevens and his staff are very professional and very friendly. They're extremely good at making sure you get the full amount of money you deserve. If you need a DOL lawyer, I highly recommend this team. I can't be more happy that I picked Stevens and Stevens.
Mary YbarraMary Ybarra
01:33 27 Feb 24
Stephen’s and Stephen’s has kept fight for my dad. Now they are fight for my mom. They are on top of things and I would recommend them to anyone who needs help and guidance with the Uranium mines.
Dianne HarperDianne Harper
01:02 17 Feb 24
Robert and I are very pleased with Mr. Hugh Stephens and all that he has done for us. From the first moment we spoke, we sensed that though Mr. Stephens exhibits sharp business acumen, he cares deeply about his clients and he has a huge heart.
Diane pontonDiane ponton
17:38 07 Feb 24
I tried to get others to help me with this claim, and it wasn"t until I hired Mr. Stephens that things started happening. I would recommend any one to get in touch with him . I would go to him again, if i ever needed to.
Judy LeonardJudy Leonard
22:26 06 Feb 24
I very much appreciate the successful litigation concerning my husband's Hanford work related illness. Stephens & Stephens LLP were thorough, caring, considerate, and fair during this difficult time.
Kenneth GKenneth G
18:23 03 Feb 24
Mr. Stephens was able to simplify an otherwise complicated lengthy process (DEEOIC) to file an initial claim as well as a claim for impairment benefits.
18:08 03 Feb 24
Frankie KnucFrankie Knuc
19:24 08 Jan 24
I had other attorneys hired in Cortez, Colorado and Grand Jct., Colorado to assist me with receiving my uranium claim, but they were not successful. I was advised by an employee of CNS of Stephens & Stephens, LLP good work. I contacted them & they took my case It was settled very quickly. I have been very pleased with this group & would advise others of their prompt service. I would recommend them to others. Respectfully, Frankie Knuckles
Rebecca ConsolRebecca Consol
19:57 22 Dec 23
My family used Stephen’s and Stephen’s for a settlement case. We were extremely pleased with all they did. They were very professional, easy to get a hold of, and invaluable when it came to answering questions and handling complicated Department of Labor issues and forms. They also did everything in a very timely manner. I have already recommended them to other people.
Thomas CliffordThomas Clifford
15:29 21 Dec 23
I have been represented by Hugh Stevens for several years now, He and his staff has made everything so easy for me. I had lung cancer from working in the uranium processing industry, they have opened so many doors for me and made dealing with DOL so much easier. They always answer my questions in a very timely manner. I have referred several other people to him and he has been able to get them through this process also. There are benefits that I was not aware of that he has brought to my attention and been able to lead me through the process of obtaining them. I would most highly recommend him to lead anyone through this process.
Lonnie killingHawkLonnie killingHawk
02:35 14 Dec 23
When I first contacted Stephens & Stephens I was at the end of my rope with DOL. Hough and his staff got me on track and handled everything with DOL and just made this process so easy. Do not know where I'd be with out them. They are able to communicate at a layman's level and understand the client. Would strongly recommend this firm.
Ruthy LyonRuthy Lyon
21:00 28 Sep 23
Our initial conversation with Mr. Stephens was productive & reassuring. His previous experience with similar cases was obvious and very helpful, in both asking us specific questions for clarification & also addressing our own questions. Breanna is also a great asset to their team.
James O'DayJames O'Day
15:07 13 Sep 23
I have referred several friends to Hugh Stephens and they were more satisfied than they ever expected. I would refer him with confidence to anyone in need. I trust when he speaks for me, for example, in court. He is a good communicator and a deep thinker. He is well respected in his profession. He handles environmental law, injury law, and medical malpractice. He is tactful and direct and knows what he is doing. He knows the legal briar patches well.

Paraquat Lawsuits

Paraquat is a poisonous chemical commonly sprayed for agricultural purposes to kill weeds and grass since the 1960s. It is also used for defoliation and desiccation. The chemical was introduced by Chevron in the US in 1964 and is currently manufactured by Syngenta. Paraquat chemical has been banned in the EU and is now used by licensed farmers in the US.

Studies have been carried out for decades regarding the safety of Paraquat. Still, much controversy remains due to mixed findings on product safety. Some evidence has emerged that prolonged exposure to Paraquat increases the risk of early onset of Parkinson’s disease. According to these studies, agricultural workers exposed to Paraquat for a long and those living near farms using the chemical are more likely to develop Parkinson’s disease. 

Following these discoveries, numerous product liability lawsuits are filed daily against Syngenta and its distributors. Most plaintiffs are farm workers with Parkinson’s disease and a paraquat exposure history. Some evidence suggests that the manufacturer was aware of the possible link between chemical exposure and Parkinson’s but masked it.

Due to the high number of paraquat cases, the lawsuits have been consolidated in a paraquat MDL (Paraquat Prod. Liab. Lit., MDL 3004), in Illinois, under Judge Nancy Rosenstengel. The lawsuits are still in the early stages of fact discovery, and new cases are being added to the MDL. The consolidated fact discovery process focuses on scientific evidence for the defendant and plaintiffs. 

In December 2021, Judge Rosenstengel ordered all new paraquat plaintiffs to complete a plaintiff’s assessment questionnaire (PAQ). This questionnaire is like a preliminary discovery request. It requires paraquat plaintiffs to provide certain documents and information regarding their work, medical history and alleged exposure to Paraquat. Paraquat lawsuit attorneys at Stephens & Stephens can help get you the compensation you deserve for Paraquat exposure.

Paraquat lawsuit Case management order

In December 2021, the paraquat MDL judge issued a case management order (CMO) with key protocols and procedures for selecting the first pool of potential bellwether trial cases. The trial pool was composed of 16 cases with specific eligibility criteria. Eight of these cases were picked by the defense side and eight by the plaintiff’s attorneys. 

The judge gave the lawyers a fact discovery deadline of March 31, 2022. Each party would then pick two lawsuits based on the fact discovery, while the remaining lawsuits would go into expert discovery. Expert discovery would involve testimony by an expert doctor on whether the Parkinson’s condition occurred from paraquat exposure. The four cases will be tried in the first round in November 2022. The remaining twelve cases were to be scheduled for the opening round of the bellwether trials scheduled for March 2023. These dates were changed to allow for more discovery time, and a new CMO No.15 was issued, scheduling the bellwether trials to begin in July 2023. The dates were then pushed back to October 2023.

The results of the bellwether trials help in negotiations for global settlements. If the defendant is found liable, the company may be forced to part with substantial global compensation for the remaining claims.

February 2024 Paraquat lawsuit updates

As of January 2024, over five thousand Paraquat lawsuits were pending in Illinois federal court.  Judge Rosenstengel pushed the first bellwether trial scheduled for July 2023 to 2024 to allow the court time to consider admissible evidence and expert witnesses. The Daubert hearings were held in 2023,, and the judge is weighing how to resolve the expert opinion evidence challenges. 

Progress of the Paraquat lawsuit

Towards the end of 2021, Syngenta and Chevron confidentially settled a paraquat lawsuit (in Hoffmann v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC.) involving about 12 plaintiffs with Parkinson’s disease. The settlement in these lawsuits is believed to be huge as the companies seek to keep paraquat testimonies confidential. Consequently, the defendants withheld some deposition transcripts in MDL, which the plaintiff’s lawyers seek to obtain via court order.

The defendants filed a motion in January 2022 to dismiss some cases they believed were time-barred under the statute limitations. The plaintiff’s lawyers countered the motion claiming that the company was liable for the extended limitation period as they concealed information about the dangers of their product.

In August 2022, the paraquat MDL judge randomly selected 20 additional cases from the 1,700 cases pending in the MDL for limited fact discovery. The judge ordered that the plaintiffs’ depositions be completed within 60 days and a testimony summary report provided to the court. These discoveries will help the legal teams on either side get a feel of the paraquat lawsuits and determine settlement amounts.

In February 2023, the plaintiffs in the Paraquat MDL filed a motion seeking the court to order Exponent Inc., a third-party scientific consulting company, to provide documents related to a Syngenta project they worked on regarding the safety of Paraquat. Exponent refuses to issue the documents in response to boilerplate objections and a prior subpoena. Consequently, Exponent and Syngenta filed a response objecting to the compulsion motion. This resistance could be equated to the documents’ value in the causation and knowledge part of the defendant.

In March 2023, the parties engaged in a battle over key expert witnesses to prove the link between Parkinson’s and Paraquat. The defense side opposes a supplemental report from the plaintiffs’ key expert witness, Prof. David Mortensen, a professor of plant ecology at Penn State University. The report was filed three months after the expert reports deadline and contained issues arising from his depositions. The ruling on the submission of this report is still pending.

Also, the defense has been targeting another plaintiff expert witness, expert statistician Martin Wells, seeking his removal. This expert is expected to testify to a meta-analysis he performed on various epidemiological studies supporting the connection between Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease. The defense in the lawsuit claims that Wells only picked and focused on studies that supported his conclusion. The plaintiffs are expected to file their response, and the court will provide its ruling on both witnesses before the trial scheduled for October 2023.

In March 2023, over 200 paraquat lawsuits in Pennsylvania state courts were consolidated into an MDL in Philadelphia, and they are also taking in a new case through the short form complaint (SFC). Paraquat lawsuits in Pennsylvania are subject to the statute of limitations, which provides deadlines for filing claims. Therefore, plaintiffs must file their lawsuits within two years of diagnosis; otherwise, their cases are dismissed. 

As of March 16, 2023, the federal Paraquat MDL had 2,998 pending cases, and new cases are still being added to the MDL. Our Paraquat attorneys can help you with your case, too.

What is Paraquat?

Paraquat dichloride is a toxic chemical used for weed and grass control (herbicide). The chemical kills plants by inducing oxidative stress. In the US, the chemical is sold in liquid form and is classified by EPA as “restricted use”, meaning it is only used by licensed persons and organizations. Since it is highly toxic when consumed, the chemical appears like a blue dye with a sharp odor to avoid accidental consumption. 

The use of Paraquat has been increasing as some weeds have become resistant to other herbicides. The most common paraquat brand name is Gramoxone, manufactured by Syngenta, an agrochemical company based in Switzerland.

Other products containing Paraquat include Ortho-Paraquat, Blanco, Devour, Firestorm, Bonedry, Helmquat 3SL, Cyclone SL 2.0, Paraquat Concentrate and Para-Shot 3.0

Paraquat poisoning occurs when the chemical is inhaled, ingested, or if it comes into contact with the skin. The effects on the individual depend on their health condition and duration of exposure. When ingested, it damages the lining of the mouth, stomach and intestines and causes toxic reactions in the lungs, liver, and kidneys. Seven out of ten people who ingest Paraquat die, even when consumed in small amounts.

Even after surviving the paraquat poisoning, the individual suffers from long-term lung damage because the lung cells accumulate the chemical and get inflamed and scarred. It also leads to oesophagal strictures, kidney failure and heart failure. 

Studies carried out over the past decade have shown that long-term occupational exposure to Paraquat can lead to Parkinson’s disease. 

What is Parkinson’s disease (PD)?

Parkinson’s is a neurological disorder involving the deterioration of specific brain cells that control body motor functions. The disease causes symptoms such as muscle stiffness, lack of balance, tremors, and impaired movement. PD symptoms start gradually progressing, making it challenging to talk and walk. The affected person may have specific behavioral and mental changes, depression, fatigue, loss of memory, and sleep problems.

PD is more prevalent in men, and the causes are believed to be genetic factors and exposure to some chemicals, such as pesticides. Age is also a risk factor, with most people developing Parkinson’s disease symptoms from age 60. Early onset of Parkinson’s can begin at 50 and is often related to gene alterations.

How does Parkinson’s disease occur?

The disease’s prominent symptoms begin showing when nerve cells in the basal ganglia become impaired or die- this is the brain section controlling movements. These nerve cells are also responsible for dopamine production; thus, the production reduces as they degenerate. Dopamine is a chemical that sends signals that help with movement. Many factors are speculated to cause the death of these neurons.

Parkinson’s patients also lose nerve endings producing norepinephrine- a sympathetic nervous system chemical messenger. This compound controls body functions such as heart rate and blood pressure. As a result, the individual experiences slow digestion, fatigue and irregular blood pressure, especially when the person stands from a sitting position. 

The brain cells of Parkinson’s patients contain Lewy bodies. These are unusual protein alpha-synuclein clumps, which researchers are yet to establish their relationship to Parkinson’s condition. 

The disease is diagnosed through neurological examination. There is no cure for Parkinson’s disease. However, symptoms are reduced through medication, surgical treatment and therapy.

Studies connecting PD and Paraquat

Paraquat has become a key focus in studying possible causes of Parkinson’s disease. This is because a paraquat molecule is structurally similar to the chemical used to induce Parkinson’s disease in experimental animals (N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) MTPTP. 

Animal and self-reported Parkinson’s disease studies have shown a close connection between Parkinson’s and Paraquat. This chemical causes oxidative stress related to PD. One of the most recent paraquat studies published in September 2021 also discovered that exposure to Paraquat among pregnant women leads to prenatal neurodevelopment toxicity, with close symptoms to those of Parkinson’s disease.

A study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology in 2009 shows a close link between paraquat exposure and Parkinson’s disease. According to this study, people living within 1600ft of areas sprayed with Paraquat are at increased risk of Parkinson’s disease. The researchers also published more detailed research in the same journal in 2011, concluding a solid association between Parkinson’s and paraquat exposure. The primary concern with these studies is that they were not controlled, leading to much criticism.

In 2014, 5 case-controlled studies strongly linking PD to Paraquat were published in the Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. Prompted by these findings, the EPA began conducting a safety review of Paraquat in 2016. 

In 2021, Greenpeace published the paraquat papers detailing the attempts by Syngenta and Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI) to conceal paraquat exposure risks from the public. ICI undertook several strategies to keep the herbicide in the market, such as adding PP796 to the product to reduce its toxicity. This component works by inducing vomiting when Paraquat is ingested. Former Syngenta toxicologist Jon Heylings also reported the low levels of PP796 in the Gramoxine, stating that they were insufficient to induce vomiting in people who consumed the minimal lethal dose. Jon also said he had raised the issue with his superiors several times, and no action was taken. He blamed the company’s former toxicologist stating that he misled the company.

Expected Settlement for a Paraquat Lawsuit

Since the paraquat bellwether cases are yet to be tried, we can only speculate on the settlements based on payouts in similar claims. Attorneys believe payouts could range between $250,000 and $600,000, up to $1M. 

Who is eligible for a paraquat lawsuit?

Those who can file for a paraquat lawsuit include those exposed to the chemical and later diagnosed with Parkinson’s. Contact us if you suspect your or your loved one’s Parkinson’s disease could be due to paraquat exposure. We handle paraquat cases on a contingency basis. 

Here are the eligibility criteria:

  • Those who came into contact with Paraquat
  • Worked in a company using Paraquat
  • Lived near a far using paraquat herbicides
  • Developed Parkinson’s disease after exposure to Paraquat

Call the Paraquat Mass Tort Lawyers From Stephens & Stephens, LLC

The Paraquat mass tort lawyers from Stephens & Stephens, LLC can help. Our Paraquat lawsuit attorneys can be reached when you call 1-800-548-4494 or fill out the contact form on our website.