Call Us Now: 716.208.3525

EEOICPA & RECA Attorneys

Stephens & Stephens has obtained over $60 million through the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act and the Energy Employees Occupation Illness Compensation Act for our clients

Gloria ReynoldsGloria Reynolds
04:16 30 Mar 24
Stephens & Stephens was very helpful in getting my claim processed and helping me in getting my settlement, staff was knowledgeable and professional and very kind if I call and needed to ask a question they would call me back within a timely manner. Thank you so much for your help .Continue to be blessed Gloria
Dee GodfreyDee Godfrey
18:49 12 Mar 24
I was astounded with the service I received from Mr. Hugh Stephens in regard to my husband's compensation claim. He was not only efficient, but also compassionate, and communicated clearly and frequently. Because of his outstanding efforts and expertise, I, who am now a grieving widow, am unexpectedly stabile and secure. I had little to do. He did all the heavy lifting. I'm so very grateful for his help. I'll always remember not only his professionalism, but also his kindness.
Audrey OgletreeAudrey Ogletree
22:19 09 Mar 24
From: Laurence OgletreeI received good assistance from Stephens & Stephens in submitting the recent claim for increased impairment benefits from the Energy Workers program.
Randy MooreRandy Moore
14:48 07 Mar 24
I was a machinist at Honeywell F.M.&T.and developed bilateral tinnitus and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. They helped me file a claim with EEOICPA in 2017. Stephen’s & Stephen’s was very good to work with, they take care of all the paperwork and help with any paperwork I receive from the Department of Labor. They stay on top of things helping with scheduling impairment reviews etc.I feel that without their help this would have been a very overwhelming process.I plan on still using them if any other illnesses occur due to my employment with Honeywell.
Mike DauzatMike Dauzat
15:54 02 Mar 24
I highly recommend Stevens and Stevens. Hugh Stevens and his staff are very professional and very friendly. They're extremely good at making sure you get the full amount of money you deserve. If you need a DOL lawyer, I highly recommend this team. I can't be more happy that I picked Stevens and Stevens.
Mary YbarraMary Ybarra
01:33 27 Feb 24
Stephen’s and Stephen’s has kept fight for my dad. Now they are fight for my mom. They are on top of things and I would recommend them to anyone who needs help and guidance with the Uranium mines.
Dianne HarperDianne Harper
01:02 17 Feb 24
Robert and I are very pleased with Mr. Hugh Stephens and all that he has done for us. From the first moment we spoke, we sensed that though Mr. Stephens exhibits sharp business acumen, he cares deeply about his clients and he has a huge heart.
Diane pontonDiane ponton
17:38 07 Feb 24
I tried to get others to help me with this claim, and it wasn"t until I hired Mr. Stephens that things started happening. I would recommend any one to get in touch with him . I would go to him again, if i ever needed to.
Judy LeonardJudy Leonard
22:26 06 Feb 24
I very much appreciate the successful litigation concerning my husband's Hanford work related illness. Stephens & Stephens LLP were thorough, caring, considerate, and fair during this difficult time.
Kenneth GKenneth G
18:23 03 Feb 24
Mr. Stephens was able to simplify an otherwise complicated lengthy process (DEEOIC) to file an initial claim as well as a claim for impairment benefits.
18:08 03 Feb 24
Frankie KnucFrankie Knuc
19:24 08 Jan 24
I had other attorneys hired in Cortez, Colorado and Grand Jct., Colorado to assist me with receiving my uranium claim, but they were not successful. I was advised by an employee of CNS of Stephens & Stephens, LLP good work. I contacted them & they took my case It was settled very quickly. I have been very pleased with this group & would advise others of their prompt service. I would recommend them to others. Respectfully, Frankie Knuckles
Rebecca ConsolRebecca Consol
19:57 22 Dec 23
My family used Stephen’s and Stephen’s for a settlement case. We were extremely pleased with all they did. They were very professional, easy to get a hold of, and invaluable when it came to answering questions and handling complicated Department of Labor issues and forms. They also did everything in a very timely manner. I have already recommended them to other people.
Thomas CliffordThomas Clifford
15:29 21 Dec 23
I have been represented by Hugh Stevens for several years now, He and his staff has made everything so easy for me. I had lung cancer from working in the uranium processing industry, they have opened so many doors for me and made dealing with DOL so much easier. They always answer my questions in a very timely manner. I have referred several other people to him and he has been able to get them through this process also. There are benefits that I was not aware of that he has brought to my attention and been able to lead me through the process of obtaining them. I would most highly recommend him to lead anyone through this process.
Lonnie killingHawkLonnie killingHawk
02:35 14 Dec 23
When I first contacted Stephens & Stephens I was at the end of my rope with DOL. Hough and his staff got me on track and handled everything with DOL and just made this process so easy. Do not know where I'd be with out them. They are able to communicate at a layman's level and understand the client. Would strongly recommend this firm.
Ruthy LyonRuthy Lyon
21:00 28 Sep 23
Our initial conversation with Mr. Stephens was productive & reassuring. His previous experience with similar cases was obvious and very helpful, in both asking us specific questions for clarification & also addressing our own questions. Breanna is also a great asset to their team.
James O'DayJames O'Day
15:07 13 Sep 23
I have referred several friends to Hugh Stephens and they were more satisfied than they ever expected. I would refer him with confidence to anyone in need. I trust when he speaks for me, for example, in court. He is a good communicator and a deep thinker. He is well respected in his profession. He handles environmental law, injury law, and medical malpractice. He is tactful and direct and knows what he is doing. He knows the legal briar patches well.

EEOICPA Covered Facilities: Westinghouse Electric Corp.

The EEOICPA was passed in 2000. It provides compensation to workers who became ill as a result of their employment manufacturing nuclear weapons in the USA, as well as their spouses, children, and grandchildren. Westinghouse Electric Corp. EEOICPA coverage is available for qualified former Workers and their families.

Are you eligible for compensation? If you or a family member worked at this or another AWE facility and became ill, you may be entitled to compensation of up to $150K plus medical benefits. Call EEOICPA Counsel Hugh Stephens at 1-855-548-4494 or fill out our free claim evaluation, We can help even if you’ve already filed, even if your claim was denied!

Here, we have compiled publicly available information and documentation about the facilities covered by the Act to clarify how their activities relate to the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act.

Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Also Known As: North American Phillips Lighting,Westinghouse Electric Company Lamp Divisions, and North American Philips Lighting Corporation.
State: New Jersey
Location: Bloomfield
Time Period: AWE 1942 -1949; Residual Radiation 1950-March 1, 2011
Facility Type: Atomic Weapons Employer

Facility Description: Westinghouse Electric, located in Bloomfield, NJ, was one of the large commercial contributors to Manhattan Project research. Specific tasks related to uranium metal production and enrichment. Because developing the technology to produce pure uranium metal became a priority for the Manhattan Project, universities, and private companies with experience in related chemical processes participated in the task. From 1942- 1943, Westinghouse used a photochemical process for metallic uranium and supplied metallic uranium for the first self-sustaining chain reaction in Chicago. In addition to contributing to uranium metal production, Westinghouse Electric participated in activities related to uranium enrichment.

Westinghouse also worked with thorium under contract W-7409-ENG-31 for the Manhattan Project at this location.

During the period of residual contamination, as designated by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and as noted in the dates above, employees of subsequent owners and operators of this facility are also covered under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act.

Westinghouse Electric Corp. is listed as an Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) under the EEOICPA.

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Classes:
All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked at Westinghouse Electric Corp., Bloomfield, New Jersey, from August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1949, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the SEC.

Petitions Qualified for Evaluation
Location: Bloomfield, New Jersey
Job Titles and/or Job Duties: All Atomic Weapons Employer employees
Period of Employment: August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1949

As of 01/08/2023, the total compensation paid under Part B of the EEOICPA, including medical compensation, for workers suffering from the effects of having worked at the Westinghouse Electric Corp. (New Jersey) is $2,852,481. Click here for a current accounting of compensation paid to former Westinghouse Electric Corp. Workers under the EEOICPA.

Westinghouse Electric Corp. (New Jersey) Workers:
If you or your parent worked at this or any other AWE facility and became ill, you may be entitled to compensation of up to $150K plus medical benefits from the US Department of Labor. Call EEOICPA Counsel Hugh Stephens at 1-855-EEOICPA (336-4272) or fill out the form to the right, whether or not you have already filed a claim and even if your claim has been accepted or denied.

We can help with all OWCP (Federal Workers Compensation) claims, impairments, wage loss and health care. 2495 Main Street, Suite 442 Buffalo, NY 142414

*Site Function:
From 1941 to 1943 at its Bloomfield, New Jersey, facility,Westinghouse developed a photochemical technique to produce uranium metal using uranium oxide or nitrate and potassium fluoride. The

process was used to produce limited quantities of uranium. (Under the best weather conditions with good sunlight, the process could produce 1 ton/month.) The green salt produced by the reaction was electrolyzed to yield uranium metal that was subsequently cast into discs, tuballoy, pellets, and ingots. Five MED contracts have been identified: -W-7407-Eng-2 (LYTMET, August 1, 1942); W-7407-Eng-132 (equipment, December 18, 1943); W-7409-Eng-31 (thorium metal, August8, 1944); W-7405-Eng-312 (chemistry of uranium, date unknown); andW-7505-Eng-312(Z) (Micronex-development of high speed X-ray tubes and circuits, date unknown). LYTMET presumably refers to the photochemical uranium production. It is unknown whether the other contracts pertain to work performed at the Bloomfield facility.

Site Description:
This facility is located in Bloomfield, New Jersey, and was owned and operated by the Westinghouse Electric Corporation until 1982 when it was acquired by North American Philips Lighting Corporation. Only Building 7 was used in the MED work. Uranium processed on the roofwas pipe-fed to the basement laboratory for purification. The pipe was stripped from the facility, along with other process equipment, atthe conclusion of the MED work. The disposition of this material has not been determined.

**Site Operations History
During World War II, WEC was contracted to produce uranium in support of the MED. Operations during this period, from August 1, 1942 through December 31, 1949, are also described in SEC Petition Evaluation Report for Petition SEC-00159 (NIOSH, 2010).

WEC developed a photochemical technique to produce uranium metal using uranium oxide or nitrate and potassium fluoride. The process was used to produce limited quantities of uranium. (Under the best weather conditions with good sunlight, the process could produce 1 ton/month.) The green salt produced by the reaction was electrolyzed to yield uranium metal that was subsequently cast into discs, pellets, and ingots (DOE, undated). The contract began on August 1, 1942 (DOE, undated) and was completed on October 15, 1943 (Unspecified, 1942-1943), and would have been capable of producing a total of 14.5 tons of uranium metal. At the end of this contract in 1945, the process equipment was removed (DOE, undated) and the uranium production facility was deactivated. After deactivation, the basement area was used primarily as a research testing laboratory (Westinghouse, 1980, PDF p. 30).

WEC also worked with thorium under contract W-7409-ENG-31 for the MED. They produced a total of 200 pounds of thorium metal in the form of bars, tubes, sheets, and wire in early 1945 (Uranium, undated, PDF p. 4). WEC also performed natural uranium machining operations for Fernald during short-term projects under contract from February 1958 through May 1958 and throughout June 1959. During these projects, WEC performed test rollings of uranium tubes on the Assel Mill to evaluate whether this process could be used to elongate hollow fuel rods for eventual use in a nuclear reactor as part of the nuclear weapons production complex (Simmons, 1959, PDF p. 74). The actual machining was scheduled to take one or two days (Kirkman, 1958, PDF p. 6), and the first test was attended by a Health and Safety Laboratory (HASL) representative, May 12 through May 16, 1958 (Ross, 1958). The work was performed on a No.1 Witter mill (also known as an Assel mill) (Simmons, 1958, PDF p. 100). The first test was unsuccessful because of excessive slippage between the work piece and the roll surfaces. A second rotary-elongation test was conducted on the same mill in June 1959. The actual machining during this second test occurred from June 25 through June 29, 1959, as indicated by the air monitoring dates (Monitoring, 1959). The mill-roll speed was reduced to 43 rpm (128 rpm was used in the previous test) (Steck, 1963).

NIOSH is not aware of any additional uranium machining operations at WEC after June 30, 1959 (Ansari, 1993, PDF p. 12).


Records indicate that on July 12, 1961, AEC issued a commercial license to WEC, License No. SMB- 353, to conduct R&D with thorium and uranium and to manufacture thorium-tungsten wire (for lighting applications) and thorium-containing welding rods. The license required WEC personnel to clean and maintain the work areas free of contamination, and to survey themselves upon exiting the work areas (SMB-353, 1961-1962, PDF p. 6). A second license, AEC License No. STB-467, was also issued to WEC for using thorium in the manufacture of mercury vapor lamps. The two licensed activities were consolidated under License No. SMB-353, and License No. STB-467 was subsequently terminated in November 1967 (Roberts, 1993, PDF p. 5).

In 1976 the Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) began a review of the radiological status of the facilities involved in supporting the MED under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) (Roberts, 1993, PDF p. 5). An October 1976 survey by ERDA staff identified contamination in the basement of Building 7 in floor drains, along the base of the walls and support columns where the walls joined the floor, and around support columns of a loading dock at the rear of the building. This survey was limited to Building 7 since it was the only portion of the WEC facility where MED work was performed (Roberts, 1993, PDF p. 6). After the ERDA survey results, WEC used the services of an outside contractor to clean contaminated areas at their own expense. Although some contamination remained above the then-current criteria for release for unrestricted use, ERDA did not recommend further remediation, but suggested that the residual contamination be licensed by the NRC as a means of further radiological control. In February 1978, WEC requested that the NRC amend their license to include this residual contamination (Roberts, 1993, PDF p. 6).

On September 29, 1977, Building 10 was released and approved for demolition by the NRC (SMB- 353, 1977-1980, PDF p. 6).




NIOSH SEC Petition Evaluation Reports
Petition 159 (Aug 13, 1942 to Dec 31, 1949)
SEC Petition Evaluation Report, Petition SEC-00159, Rev #: 0
Report Submittal Date: January 14, 2010

Petition 217 (Jan 1, 1950 to Mar 1, 2011)
SEC Petition Evaluation Report, Petition SEC-00217, Rev #:0
Report Submittal Date: April 14, 2015