Call Us Now: 716.208.3525

EEOICPA & RECA Attorneys

Stephens & Stephens has obtained over $60 million through the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act and the Energy Employees Occupation Illness Compensation Act for our clients

5.0
Based on 23 reviews
powered by Google
Gloria Reynolds
04:16 30 Mar 24
Stephens & Stephens was very helpful in getting my claim processed and helping me in getting my settlement, staff was knowledgeable and professional and very kind if I call and needed to ask a question they would call me back within a timely manner. Thank you so much for your help .Continue to be blessed Gloria
Dee Godfrey
18:49 12 Mar 24
I was astounded with the service I received from Mr. Hugh Stephens in regard to my husband's compensation claim. He was not only efficient, but also compassionate, and communicated clearly and frequently. Because of his outstanding efforts and expertise, I, who am now a grieving widow, am unexpectedly stabile and secure. I had little to do. He did all the heavy lifting. I'm so very grateful for his help. I'll always remember not only his professionalism, but also his kindness.
Audrey Ogletree
22:19 09 Mar 24
From: Laurence Ogletree
I received good assistance from Stephens & Stephens in submitting the recent claim for increased impairment benefits from the Energy Workers program.
Randy Moore
14:48 07 Mar 24
I was a machinist at Honeywell F.M.&T.and developed bilateral tinnitus and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. They helped me file a claim with EEOICPA in 2017. Stephen’s & Stephen’s was very good to work with, they take care of all the paperwork and help with any paperwork I receive from the Department of Labor. They stay on top of things helping with scheduling impairment reviews etc.
I feel that without their help this would have been a very overwhelming process.
I plan on still using them if any other illnesses occur due to my employment with Honeywell.
Mike Dauzat
15:54 02 Mar 24
I highly recommend Stevens and Stevens. Hugh Stevens and his staff are very professional and very friendly. They're extremely good at making sure you get the full amount of money you deserve. If you need a DOL lawyer, I highly recommend this team. I can't be more happy that I picked Stevens and Stevens.
Mary Ybarra
01:33 27 Feb 24
Stephen’s and Stephen’s has kept fight for my dad. Now they are fight for my mom. They are on top of things and I would recommend them to anyone who needs help and guidance with the Uranium mines.
Dianne Harper
01:02 17 Feb 24
Robert and I are very pleased with Mr. Hugh Stephens and all that he has done for us. From the first moment we spoke, we sensed that though Mr. Stephens exhibits sharp business acumen, he cares deeply about his clients and he has a huge heart.
Diane ponton
17:38 07 Feb 24
I tried to get others to help me with this claim, and it wasn"t until I hired Mr. Stephens that things started happening. I would recommend any one to get in touch with him . I would go to him again, if i ever needed to.
Judy Leonard
22:26 06 Feb 24
I very much appreciate the successful litigation concerning my husband's Hanford work related illness. Stephens & Stephens LLP were thorough, caring, considerate, and fair during this difficult time.
Kenneth G
18:23 03 Feb 24
Mr. Stephens was able to simplify an otherwise complicated lengthy process (DEEOIC) to file an initial claim as well as a claim for impairment benefits.
dave DONAID
18:08 03 Feb 24
Frankie Knuc
19:24 08 Jan 24
I had other attorneys hired in Cortez, Colorado and Grand Jct., Colorado to assist me with receiving my uranium claim, but they were not successful. I was advised by an employee of CNS of Stephens & Stephens, LLP good work. I contacted them & they took my case It was settled very quickly. I have been very pleased with this group & would advise others of their prompt service. I would recommend them to others. Respectfully, Frankie Knuckles
Rebecca Consol
19:57 22 Dec 23
My family used Stephen’s and Stephen’s for a settlement case. We were extremely pleased with all they did. They were very professional, easy to get a hold of, and invaluable when it came to answering questions and handling complicated Department of Labor issues and forms. They also did everything in a very timely manner. I have already recommended them to other people.
Thomas Clifford
15:29 21 Dec 23
I have been represented by Hugh Stevens for several years now, He and his staff has made everything so easy for me. I had lung cancer from working in the uranium processing industry, they have opened so many doors for me and made dealing with DOL so much easier. They always answer my questions in a very timely manner. I have referred several other people to him and he has been able to get them through this process also. There are benefits that I was not aware of that he has brought to my attention and been able to lead me through the process of obtaining them. I would most highly recommend him to lead anyone through this process.
Lonnie killingHawk
02:35 14 Dec 23
When I first contacted Stephens & Stephens I was at the end of my rope with DOL. Hough and his staff got me on track and handled everything with DOL and just made this process so easy. Do not know where I'd be with out them. They are able to communicate at a layman's level and understand the client. Would strongly recommend this firm.
Ruthy Lyon
21:00 28 Sep 23
Our initial conversation with Mr. Stephens was productive & reassuring. His previous experience with similar cases was obvious and very helpful, in both asking us specific questions for clarification & also addressing our own questions. Breanna is also a great asset to their team.
James O'Day
15:07 13 Sep 23
I have referred several friends to Hugh Stephens and they were more satisfied than they ever expected. I would refer him with confidence to anyone in need. I trust when he speaks for me, for example, in court. He is a good communicator and a deep thinker. He is well respected in his profession. He handles environmental law, injury law, and medical malpractice. He is tactful and direct and knows what he is doing. He knows the legal briar patches well.

Onsite Participants’ Compensation under RECA

Stephens and Stephens RECA lawyers assist eligible onsite participants in filing RECA claims for compensation. Onsite participants are individuals who took part in nuclear testing operations and later suffered from radiation-related illnesses. The United States government conducted many atmospheric nuclear detonations before January 1, 1963, in New Mexico, the Nevada Test Site, the South Pacific, and Alaska. Individuals who participated in these atomic tests were significantly exposed to high levels of radiation, which put them at an increased risk of developing certain health conditions, including cancer. The government provides compensation to affected onsite participants or survivors through the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA)

Do you qualify for a RECA onsite participant claim?

If you think you are eligible for RECA compensation, we can help you file a claim with the department of justice (DOJ), who determines your eligibility for compensation. If you participated in atmospheric nuclear testing and later suffered from a specified illness, you are eligible for compensation of $100,000. Filing a successful RECA claim is not easy without the help of an experienced RECA lawyer. An attorney can help you gather the evidence you require to get compensated quickly. Claimants filing onsite participant claims must prove the following:

  1. Onsite participation during a nuclear test: For a claim to be accepted for compensation, you must prove that you participated onsite in a test involving the atmospheric detonation of a nuclear device. The Attorney General consults with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy to confirm if an individual participated onsite in a test involving the atmospheric detonation of a nuclear device.
  2. Medical evidence: You must submit written medical documentation showing that you developed a specified illness after the specified latency period following such participation or exposure.

RECA Specified diseases

RECA identifies certain illnesses as linked to radiation exposure. Onsite participants affected by these illnesses can claim compensation if they have a relevant medical diagnosis and evidence of onsite participation. The RECA specified diseases include:

  1. Leukemia, other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia: initial exposure must have occurred after the age of 20, and the onset of the disease occurred at least 2 years after the first exposure.
  2. Other diseases, provided onset was at least 5 years after first exposure include: multiple myeloma, lymphomas (other than Hodgkin’s disease), and primary cancer of the: thyroid, male or female breast, esophagus, stomach, pharynx, small intestine, pancreas, bile ducts, gall bladder, salivary gland, urinary bladder, brain, colon, ovary, liver (except if cirrhosis or hepatitis B is indicated), or lung.

Who can file a RECA onsite participant claim?

Onsite participants and their eligible survivors can file a RECA claim. Onsite participants are individuals who were present at the test sites during the operational period, on official military duties in connection with ships, aircraft, or other equipment used in direct support of the nuclear test. They also include those who were present at the test sites or other test staging areas during the six-month period following the official operational period of an atmospheric nuclear test, performing official military duties in connection with the completion of projects related to the nuclear test, including decontamination of equipment used during the nuclear test.

Service as a member of the garrison or maintenance forces on Eniwetok during the periods June 21, 1951, through July 1, 1952, August 7, 1956, through August 7, 1957, or November 1, 1958, through April 30, 1959, is also recognized as onsite participation.

Onsite participants also include individuals assigned to official military duties at Naval Shipyards involving the decontamination of ships that participated in Operation Crossroads.

Some of the nuclear test operations conducted include:

  1. Operation Trinity, the period starting July 16, 1945, through August 6, 1945.
  2. Operation Crossroads, the period starting July 1, 1946, through August 31, 1946.
  3. Operation Sandstone, the period starting April 15, 1948, through May 20, 1948.
  4. Operation Ranger, the period starting January 27, 1951, through February 6, 1951.
  5. Operation Greenhouse, the period starting April 8, 1951, through June 20, 1951.
  6. Operation Buster-Jangle, the period starting October 22, 1951, through December 20, 1951.
  7. Operation Tumbler-Snapper, the period starting April 1, 1952, through June 20, 1952.
  8. Operation Ivy, the period starting November 1, 1952, through December 31, 1952.
  9. Operation Upshot-Knothole, the period starting March 17, 1953, through June 20, 1953.
  10. Operation Castle, the period starting March 1, 1954, through May 31, 1954.
  11. Operation Teapot, the period starting February 18, 1955, through June 10, 1955.
  12. Operation Wigwam, the period starting May 14, 1955, through May 15, 1955.
  13. Operation Redwing, the period starting May 5, 1956, through August 6, 1956.
  14. Operation Plumbbob, the period starting May 28, 1957, through October 22, 1957.
  15. Operation Hardtack I, the period starting April 28, 1958, through October 31, 1958.
  16. Operation Argus, the period starting August 27, 1958, through September 10, 1958.
  17. Operation Hardtack II, the period starting September 19, 1958, through October 31, 1958.
  18. Operation Dominic I, the period starting April 25, 1962, through December 31, 1962.
  19. Operation Dominic II/Plowshare, the period starting July 6, 1962, through August 15, 1962.

Survivor On-site participant RECA claims

In the case the onsite participant is deceased at the time of payment, his or her survivors can claim payment in the following order:

(i) Surviving spouse: Payment is made to the husband or wife of the individual if he or she is living at the time of payment. However, they must have been married for at least one year immediately before the individual’s death.

(ii) Children: If there is no surviving spouse, payment is made in equal shares to all the individual’s children who are living at the time of payment. Eligible children include recognized natural children, adopted children, and stepchildren who lived with an individual in a regular parent-child relationship.

(iii) Parents: If there is no surviving spouse and if there are no living children, such payment is made in equal shares to the individual’s natural or adoptive parents who are living at the time of payment.

(iv) Grandchildren: If there is no surviving spouse, children, or parents, such payment is made in equal shares to all the individual’s grandchildren who are living at the time of payment.

(v) Grandparents: If there is no surviving spouse, children, parents, or grandchildren, then such payment shall be made in equal shares to the individual’s grandparents who are living at the time of payment.

For cases involving Indian tribes, Native American law, tradition, and customs are considered when determining a claimant’s eligibility for compensation based on marriage, relationship, or survivorship.

Offset of RECA onsite participant claims

For payment to be made, the DOJ must confirm if any payment was previously made to the individual, on behalf of the individual, or to a survivor of the individual. RECA payments made to an individual or to a survivor of that individual must be offset by the amount of any payment made based on injuries incurred by that individual on account of exposure to radiation as a result of onsite participation in a test involving the atmospheric detonation of a nuclear device. Payments made on workers’ compensation claims are not deducted. The amount of the offset is based on the actuarial present value of such payments.

Let us help you file a RECA claim

Contact our RECA attorney, R. Hugh Stephens, if you or a loved one suffers from a specified illness after participation in nuclear tests. We can help you claim the compensation you deserve for the harm you suffered while serving national security interests. We can also assist you with appealing if you feel that your claim was wrongfully denied.