Call Us Now: 716.208.3525

EEOICPA & RECA Attorneys

Stephens & Stephens has obtained over $60 million through the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act and the Energy Employees Occupation Illness Compensation Act for our clients

5.0
Based on 23 reviews
powered by Google
Gloria Reynolds
04:16 30 Mar 24
Stephens & Stephens was very helpful in getting my claim processed and helping me in getting my settlement, staff was knowledgeable and professional and very kind if I call and needed to ask a question they would call me back within a timely manner. Thank you so much for your help .Continue to be blessed Gloria
Dee Godfrey
18:49 12 Mar 24
I was astounded with the service I received from Mr. Hugh Stephens in regard to my husband's compensation claim. He was not only efficient, but also compassionate, and communicated clearly and frequently. Because of his outstanding efforts and expertise, I, who am now a grieving widow, am unexpectedly stabile and secure. I had little to do. He did all the heavy lifting. I'm so very grateful for his help. I'll always remember not only his professionalism, but also his kindness.
Audrey Ogletree
22:19 09 Mar 24
From: Laurence Ogletree
I received good assistance from Stephens & Stephens in submitting the recent claim for increased impairment benefits from the Energy Workers program.
Randy Moore
14:48 07 Mar 24
I was a machinist at Honeywell F.M.&T.and developed bilateral tinnitus and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. They helped me file a claim with EEOICPA in 2017. Stephen’s & Stephen’s was very good to work with, they take care of all the paperwork and help with any paperwork I receive from the Department of Labor. They stay on top of things helping with scheduling impairment reviews etc.
I feel that without their help this would have been a very overwhelming process.
I plan on still using them if any other illnesses occur due to my employment with Honeywell.
Mike Dauzat
15:54 02 Mar 24
I highly recommend Stevens and Stevens. Hugh Stevens and his staff are very professional and very friendly. They're extremely good at making sure you get the full amount of money you deserve. If you need a DOL lawyer, I highly recommend this team. I can't be more happy that I picked Stevens and Stevens.
Mary Ybarra
01:33 27 Feb 24
Stephen’s and Stephen’s has kept fight for my dad. Now they are fight for my mom. They are on top of things and I would recommend them to anyone who needs help and guidance with the Uranium mines.
Dianne Harper
01:02 17 Feb 24
Robert and I are very pleased with Mr. Hugh Stephens and all that he has done for us. From the first moment we spoke, we sensed that though Mr. Stephens exhibits sharp business acumen, he cares deeply about his clients and he has a huge heart.
Diane ponton
17:38 07 Feb 24
I tried to get others to help me with this claim, and it wasn"t until I hired Mr. Stephens that things started happening. I would recommend any one to get in touch with him . I would go to him again, if i ever needed to.
Judy Leonard
22:26 06 Feb 24
I very much appreciate the successful litigation concerning my husband's Hanford work related illness. Stephens & Stephens LLP were thorough, caring, considerate, and fair during this difficult time.
Kenneth G
18:23 03 Feb 24
Mr. Stephens was able to simplify an otherwise complicated lengthy process (DEEOIC) to file an initial claim as well as a claim for impairment benefits.
dave DONAID
18:08 03 Feb 24
Frankie Knuc
19:24 08 Jan 24
I had other attorneys hired in Cortez, Colorado and Grand Jct., Colorado to assist me with receiving my uranium claim, but they were not successful. I was advised by an employee of CNS of Stephens & Stephens, LLP good work. I contacted them & they took my case It was settled very quickly. I have been very pleased with this group & would advise others of their prompt service. I would recommend them to others. Respectfully, Frankie Knuckles
Rebecca Consol
19:57 22 Dec 23
My family used Stephen’s and Stephen’s for a settlement case. We were extremely pleased with all they did. They were very professional, easy to get a hold of, and invaluable when it came to answering questions and handling complicated Department of Labor issues and forms. They also did everything in a very timely manner. I have already recommended them to other people.
Thomas Clifford
15:29 21 Dec 23
I have been represented by Hugh Stevens for several years now, He and his staff has made everything so easy for me. I had lung cancer from working in the uranium processing industry, they have opened so many doors for me and made dealing with DOL so much easier. They always answer my questions in a very timely manner. I have referred several other people to him and he has been able to get them through this process also. There are benefits that I was not aware of that he has brought to my attention and been able to lead me through the process of obtaining them. I would most highly recommend him to lead anyone through this process.
Lonnie killingHawk
02:35 14 Dec 23
When I first contacted Stephens & Stephens I was at the end of my rope with DOL. Hough and his staff got me on track and handled everything with DOL and just made this process so easy. Do not know where I'd be with out them. They are able to communicate at a layman's level and understand the client. Would strongly recommend this firm.
Ruthy Lyon
21:00 28 Sep 23
Our initial conversation with Mr. Stephens was productive & reassuring. His previous experience with similar cases was obvious and very helpful, in both asking us specific questions for clarification & also addressing our own questions. Breanna is also a great asset to their team.
James O'Day
15:07 13 Sep 23
I have referred several friends to Hugh Stephens and they were more satisfied than they ever expected. I would refer him with confidence to anyone in need. I trust when he speaks for me, for example, in court. He is a good communicator and a deep thinker. He is well respected in his profession. He handles environmental law, injury law, and medical malpractice. He is tactful and direct and knows what he is doing. He knows the legal briar patches well.

Uranium Workers RECA Claims, South Dakota

Uranium workers employed in South Dakota mines and mills affected by certain illnesses can claim RECA compensation if they meet some specified criteria. To be considered for compensation, you must submit a claim with the Department of Justice, along with proof of specified illness and employment history. Eligible uranium workers are those who were employed for at least one year as uranium miners, millers, ore transporters, core drillers, or as remediation workers of a mill or mine, between January 1, 1942, and December 31, 1990.

Do you need a lawyer to file a RECA claim?

Contact our RECA lawyer, Hugh Stephens, on his cell phone at (716) 208-3525 if you or a loved one suffers from a uranium exposure-related illness, following uranium employment. While you can file a RECA claim on your own, the process might be complex for persons with limited experience. Hiring an experienced RECA attorney increases the chances of your claim being accepted, especially if your claim was wrongfully denied. A RECA lawyer can offer you free, invaluable advice in relation to your claim and act on your behalf throughout the entire process. An experienced RECA attorney can help you obtain medical and employment evidence, which is critical in processing claims. Eligible workers receive a lump sum payment of $150,000 under the RECA and EEOICPA, as well as medical and impairment benefits. Survivors are awarded a one-off compensation of $150,000.

Accepted illnesses for uranium workers under the RECA

Uranium workers were exposed to work-related toxins, which increased their risk of developing certain illnesses. RECA recognizes some of these conditions and provides compensation to eligible claimants. They include: lung cancer or a nonmalignant respiratory disease (such as lung and pulmonary fibrosis, corpulmonale related to lung fibrosis, silicosis, and pneumoconiosis), renal cancer or any other chronic renal disease, including nephritis and kidney tubular tissue injury.

Health risks related to uranium mining and processing

Early uranium workers were significantly exposed to high levels of radiation from radon, uranium, thorium, and radium, as well as their decay products, without the required protection and ventilation. Apart from radiation, these workers were also exposed to heavy metals (lead, vanadium, and arsenic), which are associated with kidney and bone damage. Other exposures are linked to respiratory illnesses and cancer, such as diesel, blasting residue, and chemicals used to process uranium in mills.

Uranium workers were exposed to radiation internally and externally, as well as chemicals released and used during mining and processing. Internal exposure can occur through inhalation, ingestion, or through a cut in the skin. Radiation from radon decay products presented the greatest health threat in the early uranium mining and processing activities. Radon’s alpha-emitting radioactive decay products are strongly linked to lung cancer in humans- this has been clearly established among uranium miners who were occupationally exposed to radon.

According to NIOSH, the current occupational standards for radon exposure in the United States do not provide adequate protection for workers at risk of lung cancer from radon decay exposure. Apart from Radon and its alpha-emitting radioactive decay products, Workers are also exposed to other radionuclides, including uranium, which undergo radioactive decay by alpha, beta, or gamma emission. Radium-226 and its decay products (bismuth-214 and lead-214) release alpha and gamma radiation during uranium mining and processing.

Uranium workers are significantly exposed to silica dust and diesel exhaust. Occupational studies show that both silica and diesel exhaust exposure increase the risk of lung cancer, which is also the main risk associated with radon decay product exposure.

Many researchers have expressed concerns about off-site radiation exposure to the general population related to airborne radon decay products and radionuclides in water supplies. Decay products of uranium (e.g., 230Th, 226Ra) provide a constant source of radiation in uranium tailings for thousands of years, substantially outlasting the current governmental regulations for oversight of processing facility tailings. Radionuclides such as Thorium-230 (²³⁰Th) and 226 radium (226Ra) present in mine tailings, and their decay products can seep into water sources and thereby increase radionuclide concentrations. Drinking water from these sources can increase the risk of cancer, especially bone cancer.

Uranium mining in South Dakota

Uranium deposits in South Dakota were first reported in 1929. Commercial-grade uraniferous lignite was first discovered in the Williston Basin in 1948. Despite these discoveries, the first production in the state was from a Cretaceous-age sandstone host discovered in 1951 in the Edgemont District. In 1954, a uraniferous lignite was located in the North Cave Hills, a government Forest Service land in Harding County. Production also occurred in other parts of Harding County, including the South Cave Hills and Slim Buttes. Extraction ended in 1973, when the only mill in the state was closed. During this period, the state produced approximately 3.2 million pounds of uranium oxide. About 15% of the uranium produced in South Dakota was from lignite ash (Harding Co.) and the remainder from sandstones in the Edgemont District (southern Black Hills). Uranium mining activities occurred under the General Mining Laws and Public Law 357, which did not require any restoration. The abandoned Harding County mines are being assessed for off-site environmental contamination.

Edgemont District

Edgemont District was a major producer of uranium in the 1950s. Production declined about four decades ago after the first uranium mining boom. Uranium was processed in the Edgemont mill, which was owned and operated by Susquehanna Corp.’s subsidiary Mines Development. Another Susquehanna subsidiary, Susquehanna-Western, also operated uranium mines in the area. In 1961, Susquehanna, which controlled uranium mining in the district, reported $26.1 million in revenues. The company sold its interests in the 1970s, following a decline in demand, leaving behind abandoned mines and radioactive mill tailings. Currently, the Edgemont area has many unreclaimed mines and buried radioactive waste.

There are active mining projects in the district, such as EnCore Energy’s Dewey-Burdock project, which covers approximately 12,613 surface acres and 16,962 net mineral acres. The project is estimated to have 14.2 million pounds of uranium oxide reserves, and extraction applies the in-situ recovery method.

Cave Hills

Uranium mining in the North Cave Hills and South Cave Hills of South Dakota occurred from 1954 to 1964. Uranium deposits are in the form of uraniferous lignite beds. Part of the production area lies in the Custer National Forest, a United States Forest Service (USFS) land, and extends to private land. The North Cave Hills and South Cave Hills are part of the Custer National Forest owned by the United States Forest Service (USFS). Riley Pass Uranium Mine Project, which operated within the North Cave Hills, is currently undergoing reclamation. Extraction was through strip mining, which halted due to contamination concerns. During mining, the overburden was pushed off to uncover the uranium-bearing lignite coal beds. The coal beds were removed for off-site uranium processing. Early uranium mining in the Cave Hills left piles of mine spoils with heavy metal and radioactive contamination.

Slim Buttes

The Slim Buttes region shares the same geological characteristics as the Cave Hills. The region makes up the Sioux Ranger District of the Custer National Forest. Uranium extraction in the area began in 1954. Production occurred from the uranium-bearing lignite and carnotite-bearing sandstone. Mining ceased in the 1960s.

Flint Buttes

Uranium mining occurred in Flint Buttes, Harding County, near the town of Ludlow, between the late 1950s and 1964. The Flat Top Mine Site is one of the reclaimed former mines in the region, currently on private ranch land.

How do you file a RECA Uranium Worker Claim?

For you to receive your RECA compensation, you must file a claim with the Department of Justice. You must also submit medical evidence and your employment history. Acceptable medical evidence depends on the type of illness. If you are claiming kidney disease, you can provide a kidney function test (which includes blood and urine tests) or a biopsy accompanied by a pathology report. You can prove a respiratory illness through an arterial blood gas study; a written diagnosis by a qualified physician accompanied by interpretive reports of chest x-ray, HRCT scans, CAT scans, MRI scans, and PET scans; pathology reports of tissue biopsies; and Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) indicating restrictive lung function. With the required evidence, you can have your claim compensated within six months. The deadline for filing a RECA claim is December 31, 2028.