Call Us Now: 716.208.3525

EEOICPA & RECA Attorneys

Stephens & Stephens has obtained over $60 million through the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act and the Energy Employees Occupation Illness Compensation Act for our clients

5.0
Based on 23 reviews
powered by Google
Gloria Reynolds
04:16 30 Mar 24
Stephens & Stephens was very helpful in getting my claim processed and helping me in getting my settlement, staff was knowledgeable and professional and very kind if I call and needed to ask a question they would call me back within a timely manner. Thank you so much for your help .Continue to be blessed Gloria
Dee Godfrey
18:49 12 Mar 24
I was astounded with the service I received from Mr. Hugh Stephens in regard to my husband's compensation claim. He was not only efficient, but also compassionate, and communicated clearly and frequently. Because of his outstanding efforts and expertise, I, who am now a grieving widow, am unexpectedly stabile and secure. I had little to do. He did all the heavy lifting. I'm so very grateful for his help. I'll always remember not only his professionalism, but also his kindness.
Audrey Ogletree
22:19 09 Mar 24
From: Laurence Ogletree
I received good assistance from Stephens & Stephens in submitting the recent claim for increased impairment benefits from the Energy Workers program.
Randy Moore
14:48 07 Mar 24
I was a machinist at Honeywell F.M.&T.and developed bilateral tinnitus and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. They helped me file a claim with EEOICPA in 2017. Stephen’s & Stephen’s was very good to work with, they take care of all the paperwork and help with any paperwork I receive from the Department of Labor. They stay on top of things helping with scheduling impairment reviews etc.
I feel that without their help this would have been a very overwhelming process.
I plan on still using them if any other illnesses occur due to my employment with Honeywell.
Mike Dauzat
15:54 02 Mar 24
I highly recommend Stevens and Stevens. Hugh Stevens and his staff are very professional and very friendly. They're extremely good at making sure you get the full amount of money you deserve. If you need a DOL lawyer, I highly recommend this team. I can't be more happy that I picked Stevens and Stevens.
Mary Ybarra
01:33 27 Feb 24
Stephen’s and Stephen’s has kept fight for my dad. Now they are fight for my mom. They are on top of things and I would recommend them to anyone who needs help and guidance with the Uranium mines.
Dianne Harper
01:02 17 Feb 24
Robert and I are very pleased with Mr. Hugh Stephens and all that he has done for us. From the first moment we spoke, we sensed that though Mr. Stephens exhibits sharp business acumen, he cares deeply about his clients and he has a huge heart.
Diane ponton
17:38 07 Feb 24
I tried to get others to help me with this claim, and it wasn"t until I hired Mr. Stephens that things started happening. I would recommend any one to get in touch with him . I would go to him again, if i ever needed to.
Judy Leonard
22:26 06 Feb 24
I very much appreciate the successful litigation concerning my husband's Hanford work related illness. Stephens & Stephens LLP were thorough, caring, considerate, and fair during this difficult time.
Kenneth G
18:23 03 Feb 24
Mr. Stephens was able to simplify an otherwise complicated lengthy process (DEEOIC) to file an initial claim as well as a claim for impairment benefits.
dave DONAID
18:08 03 Feb 24
Frankie Knuc
19:24 08 Jan 24
I had other attorneys hired in Cortez, Colorado and Grand Jct., Colorado to assist me with receiving my uranium claim, but they were not successful. I was advised by an employee of CNS of Stephens & Stephens, LLP good work. I contacted them & they took my case It was settled very quickly. I have been very pleased with this group & would advise others of their prompt service. I would recommend them to others. Respectfully, Frankie Knuckles
Rebecca Consol
19:57 22 Dec 23
My family used Stephen’s and Stephen’s for a settlement case. We were extremely pleased with all they did. They were very professional, easy to get a hold of, and invaluable when it came to answering questions and handling complicated Department of Labor issues and forms. They also did everything in a very timely manner. I have already recommended them to other people.
Thomas Clifford
15:29 21 Dec 23
I have been represented by Hugh Stevens for several years now, He and his staff has made everything so easy for me. I had lung cancer from working in the uranium processing industry, they have opened so many doors for me and made dealing with DOL so much easier. They always answer my questions in a very timely manner. I have referred several other people to him and he has been able to get them through this process also. There are benefits that I was not aware of that he has brought to my attention and been able to lead me through the process of obtaining them. I would most highly recommend him to lead anyone through this process.
Lonnie killingHawk
02:35 14 Dec 23
When I first contacted Stephens & Stephens I was at the end of my rope with DOL. Hough and his staff got me on track and handled everything with DOL and just made this process so easy. Do not know where I'd be with out them. They are able to communicate at a layman's level and understand the client. Would strongly recommend this firm.
Ruthy Lyon
21:00 28 Sep 23
Our initial conversation with Mr. Stephens was productive & reassuring. His previous experience with similar cases was obvious and very helpful, in both asking us specific questions for clarification & also addressing our own questions. Breanna is also a great asset to their team.
James O'Day
15:07 13 Sep 23
I have referred several friends to Hugh Stephens and they were more satisfied than they ever expected. I would refer him with confidence to anyone in need. I trust when he speaks for me, for example, in court. He is a good communicator and a deep thinker. He is well respected in his profession. He handles environmental law, injury law, and medical malpractice. He is tactful and direct and knows what he is doing. He knows the legal briar patches well.

RECA Uranium Workers’ Claims in Texas

Uranium mining has been ongoing in Texas since the 1950s. Early uranium workers were exposed to radioactive and chemical toxins, which increased their risk of developing certain illnesses and cancer. The government, through the RECA, provides compensation to affected uranium workers who meet certain criteria. These include uranium miners, millers, ore transporters, core drillers, and remediation employees of mills and mines in Texas and other uranium mining states in the country, who have worked for at least one year from January 1, 1942, to December 31, 1990.

The RECA covers certain kidney and respiratory illnesses for eligible uranium workers and their survivors. Respiratory diseases for which you can claim compensation are lung cancer, non-malignant respiratory diseases such as lung and pulmonary fibrosis, cor pulmonale related to lung fibrosis, silicosis, and pneumoconiosis. Compensable kidney illnesses include renal cancer and any other chronic renal disease, such as nephritis and kidney tubular tissue injury. For you to be considered for compensation, you must file a claim with the Department of Justice and prove that you meet the eligibility criteria. The evidence required depends on the type of claim. It may include diagnosis of covered illness, certificates of death, birth, and marriage, as well as the worker’s employment history.

The speed at which your claim is processed depends on the availability of sufficient evidence for the Department of Justice to make a decision. You can contact our RECA attorney, R. Hugh Stephens, at (716) 208-3525 for help filing a RECA claim in Oregon or anywhere in the country. He will advise you on your eligibility for the benefits, guide you through the claim application process, and help you file a successful claim. If your claim is successful, you’ll be awarded a lump sum payment of $150,000, as well as medical and impairment benefits. You might be eligible for compensation if your loved one died of a RECA-covered illness. Eligible survivor claimants may include a living spouse, children, parents, and grandchildren if they meet RECA-specified requirements. For instance, a spouse must have been married to the deceased worker for at least one year immediately before the individual’s death. Also, stepchildren must have lived with the worker in a regular parent-child relationship.

Uranium Mining in Texas

In Texas, uranium was first discovered in the west of Deweesville, Karnes County, in 1954. Mining in the region began in 1956, becoming the first large-scale uranium mining operation in the state. At the time, the uranium production industry was experiencing a boom, with a guaranteed market from the US government. Currently, uranium is used in nuclear reactors to generate electricity, in the manufacture of military equipment, and in the manufacture of medical diagnostic equipment.

By the end of 1956, about 15 uranium-mining prospects between the Rio Grande and Colorado Rivers were under exploration. By the end of 1960, the San Antonio Mining Company had extracted approximately 100,000 tons of low-grade uranium ore, ready for processing. During that same year, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) reached an agreement with Susquehanna Western (Susquehanna Company and the Western Nuclear Company) to build a $2 million processing mill. The mill was completed in 1961 and could process 200 tons of uranium into uranium oxide per day using an acid-leach extraction process. The Texas mill was the smallest of the 17 plants across the country.

The government encouraged production by offering incentives to discoveries, building access roads, assisting in drilling activities, and providing convenient assaying and ore buying stations. As a result, the growing number of new mining discoveries by the end of the 1950s caused the AEC to start limiting growth. Consequently, in 1958, the AEC announced that it was no longer in the government’s interest to expand uranium production. The commission acted by restricting new contracts from 1961 to 1966, only allowing production of proven ore reserves. This move marked the end of the first uranium boom. During this period, the government was the sole buyer of uranium in the country, and the prices were based on an agreed price.

From 1960 to 1962, the Susquehanna Company and the Western Nuclear Company entered into a purchase agreement, in which the government would buy a pound of uranium oxide for $9.90. The 1962-1966 agreement saw the government purchase processed uranium at $8.00 per pound. From 1967 to 1970, the AEC purchases were based on a new “buying stretch-out” program that excluded Texas. As a result, the Susquehanna-Western mill temporarily suspended operations.

As demand for uranium by the federal government declined, private companies were already investing in nuclear power plants. The first commercial nuclear power plant, Shipping Port Atomic Power Station, was launched on May 26, 1958. The plant was located on the Ohio River in Pennsylvania. The nuclear power plants’ demand for uranium prompted another era of uranium exploration in South Texas and other states across the country.

Between 1961 and 1967, only the Susquehanna-Western companies were engaged in production. However, after 1967, many new companies began exploring deposits across the state and pursuing leases in the Karnes County deposits as well as other counties along the Texas coastal plain. In 1969, Tenneco Minerals began mining at a site 4.5 miles south of the Susquehanna-Western mill. All new mines developed in Texas between 1976 and 1970 were shallow open-pit surface mines.

In 1968, the Susquehanna-Western’s mill in Karnes County processed about 1.2 million pounds of uranium oxide. Three additional mills were set up in Karnes and Live Oak counties to process ore from mines such as Susquehanna, Conquista JV, and Chevron. During this period, uranium oxide was going for between $5.50 and $6.00 per pound.

The industry expanded rapidly between 1970 and 1980 as the AEC partially released market controls on the price of uranium ore and eased restrictions on its sale to private nuclear power plants. Companies such as Carbide began extraction using the in-situ leaching methods at the Palangana Dome. Unlike the open-pit and underground mining techniques, the in-situ technology was safer as employees were exposed to limited levels of radiation and other toxins. Susquehanna-Western constructed an additional mill for high lime ores at Ray Point. During the same period, the Conquista open pit, owned by Pioneer Nuclear and Continental Oil, commenced production.

Health Impacts of Early Uranium Mining, Processing, and Transportation

Early uranium workers involved in the extraction, processing, and transportation of ore were exposed to high levels of radiation, among other toxins. The health effects related to uranium exposure were unknown at the time, and no protection was provided against these exposures. As a result, many uranium workers died of lung cancer, which is the main risk associated with uranium employment. Uranium exposure during mining and processing is also linked to respiratory illnesses such as lung and pulmonary fibrosis, corpulmonale related to fibrosis of the lung, silicosis, and pneumoconiosis, as well as kidney damage and cancer.

Uranium is a radioactive element that undergoes a natural decay process to produce alpha particles. Alpha radiation cannot pass through the skin, but if ingested or inhaled, it can irradiate internal tissues, disrupting DNA and increasing the risk of lung cancer among other cancers. Alpha radiation can also cause cellular damage in the kidneys and bones. Thus, prolonged inhalation of uranium dust and radon gas (a byproduct of uranium decay) placed uranium workers at an increased risk of developing lung cancer.

According to some researchers, inhaled and ingested uranium mainly targets the kidneys. Apart from radioactivity, uranium is a heavy metal and is associated with chemical toxicity. It can accumulate in the kidneys, bones, and liver, damaging them and causing cancer. This theory was recently confirmed in a study that found uranium levels in blood plasma to be lower compared to other body organs.

Uranium is significantly linked to bone damage and bone cancer. Being a chemical analog of calcium, uranium can be readily deposited in bones. It also remains in bones for longer periods than in other body organs, interfering with normal bone cell function and resulting in bone degradation over time.

Some studies also link high levels of uranium exposure with reproductive problems, congenital disabilities, neurological symptoms, cognitive deficits, and immune problems.

Contact us for Help Filing a RECA Uranium Worker Claim

While you can file a RECA claim on your own, the process might be draining, and the chances of success are low. Our RECA Lawyer can help you quickly gather the necessary evidence to file a successful claim. We will not charge you until your claim is approved and compensated. Our fee rates are defined by the RECA, i.e., 2% if your claim was accepted the first time, and 10% for claims initially denied. We offer free consultation services to our RECA claimants. It is best to file your claim as soon as possible if you are eligible. The new deadline for filing RECA claims is December 31, 2027. We are not guaranteed an extension of this deadline.